Would you like to know exactly “what” new taxes and financial burdens await you courtesy of Obama and the Dems?


Would you like to know exactly “what” new taxes and financial burdens await you courtesy of Obama and the Dems?

The question

Do any of you liberals plot to hold your guy accountable for lying about the new taxes?

And I thought we were told that it would only affect the wealthy? No more student loan deduction, no more HSAs, all tax rates going up, and the marriage penalty comes back in full force with some added bonuses…as well as the child tax credit being cut in half!
These are just SOME of the taxes on the “wealthy” that Obama and the Dems promised!!!

excerpt…
the new year will also come with a raft of tax hikes — including a return of the death tax — that will be real killers.

Through the end of this year, the federal estate tax rate is zero — thanks to the package of broad-based tax cuts that President Bush pushed through to get the economy going earlier in the decade.

But as of midnight Dec. 31, the death tax returns — at a rate of 55% on estates of $ 1 million or more. The effect this will have on hospital life-support systems is already a matter of conjecture.

Resurrection of the death tax, but, isn’t the only tax problem that will be ushered in Jan. 1. Many other cuts from the Bush handing out are set to disappear and a new set of taxes will occur. And it’s not just the rich who will pay.

The lowest bracket for the personal income tax, for instance, moves up 50% — to 15% from 10%. The next lowest bracket — 25% — will rise to 28%, and the ancient 28% bracket will be 31%. At the higher end, the 33% bracket is pushed to 36% and the 35% bracket becomes 39.6%.

But the hurt doesn’t stop there.

The marriage penalty also makes a comeback, and the capital gains tax will jump 33% — to 20% from 15%. The tax on dividends will go all the way from 15% to 39.6% — a 164% increase.

Both the cap-gains and dividend taxes will go up further in 2013 as the health care reform adds a 3.8% Medicare levy for individuals making more than $ 200,000 a year and joint filers making more than $ 250,000. Other tax hikes include: halving the child tax credit to $ 500 from $ 1,000 and fixing the standard deduction for couples at the same level as it is for single filers.

Letting the Bush cuts expire will cost taxpayers $ 115 billion next year alone, according to the Congressional Budget Office, and $ 2.6 trillion through 2020.

But even more tax headaches lie ahead. This “second wave” of hikes, as Americans for Tax Reform puts it, are designed to pay for ObamaCare and include:

The Medicine Cabinet Tax. Americans, says ATR, “will no longer be able to use health savings account, flexible spending account, or health refund pretax dollars to buy nonprescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin).”

The HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike. “This provision of ObamaCare,” according to ATR, “increases the additional tax on nonmedical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10% to 20%, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10%.”

Brand Name Drug Tax. Makers and importers of brand-name drugs will be liable for a tax of $ 2.5 billion in 2011. The tax goes to $ 3 billion a year from 2012 to 2016, then $ 3.5 billion in 2017 and $ 4.2 billion in 2018. Beginning in 2019 it falls to $ 2.8 billion and stays there. And who pays the new drug tax? Patients, in the form of higher prices.

Economic Substance Doctrine. ATR reports that “The IRS is now empowered to disallow perfectly legal tax deductions and maneuvers merely because it judges that the deduction or action lacks ‘economic substance.’”

A third and final (for now) wave, says ATR, consists of the alternative minimum tax’s widening net, tax hikes on employers and the loss of deductions for tuition:

• The Tax Policy Center, no right-wing group, says that the failure to index the AMT will subject 28.5 million families to the tax when they file next year, up from 4 million this year.

• “Small businesses can normally expense (rather than slowly deduct, or ‘depreciate’) equipment buys up to $ 250,000,” says ATR. “This will be cut all the way down to $ 25,000. Larger businesses can expense half of their buys of equipment. In January of 2011, all of it will have to be ‘depreciated.’”

• According to ATR, there are “literally scores of tax hikes on business that will take place,” plus the loss of some tax credits. The research and experimentation tax credit will be the largest loss, “but there are many, many others. Combining high marginal tax rates with the loss of this tax relief will cost jobs.”

• The deduction for tuition and fees will no longer be available and there will be limits placed on education tax credits. Teachers won’t be able to deduct their classroom expenses and employer-provided learning aid will be restricted. Thousands of families will no longer be allowed to deduct student loan interest.

http://www.investors.com/NewsAndAnalysis/Article/

FLSWAMP: Well, I guess that’s your answer…no you have no intention of holding your guys responsible!

hey, I’ll tell you what, come back at the end of next years and let us know just how your “funds” are doing, ok?

Best answers:

federal students loans

MP3 www.4shared.com Guests: Alan Collinge Student Loan Scam: During the first hour, Ian Punnett welcomed the founder of StudentLoanJustice.org, Alan Collinge, who discussed how federal student loans have become predatory, turning a generation into debtor slaves. “It’s a socially horrible epidemic,” he declared, noting that America’s total student loan debt now surpasses the nation’s credit card debt. He clarified that student loans are above all pernicious because they contain no consumer safeguards such as bankruptcy protection, statute of limitations, or the ability to re-finance the debt in an open market. As a result of these factors, Collinge said, when a loan is defaulted, it can double or even triple due to penalties and fees. In looking at the source of the problem, Collinge pointed to student loan advocates and the Department of Education as the key entities that “failed to play their part” in overseeing lending practices. According to him, the DOE has been using a faulty metric to determine the default rate on student loans, thus misleading Congress into increasing the allowable limits on colleges for lending. Additionally, Collinge said, the DOE really makes “about 22% versus what they pay out” for defaulted student loans. In order to fix the student loan epidemic, Collinge endorsed restoring bankruptcy protections for these loans. Should that happen, he said, “a multitude of problems” will resolve themselves, including an “nearly overnight” drop in

Related Links

You might also like


If Obama pushes a finance commission idea to ax the mortgage interest tax deduction how do you vote in 2012?
If Obama pushes a finance commission idea to ax the mortgage interest tax deduction how do you...

What will Obama’s “top priority” be for the 2012 election campaign?
What will Obama's "top priority" be for the 2012 election campaign? The question FREE...

Q&A: Hi, I’m Jeffrey. I am supporting Obama for 2012, are you?
Hi, I'm Jeffrey. I am supporting Obama for 2012, are you? The question Obama has...

Speak Your Mind